Hauptseminar: Embodied Cognition
Dozenten:
Hauptseminar (2 SWS)
Mi 11 -13
Ort: IIG-Seminarraum, 2. Stock
Raum-Nr.: 02009
Beginn: 23.04.2008
Abstract
In diesem interdisziplinären Hauptseminar geht es um verschiedene Ansätze in der Kognitionswissenschaft und Linguistik, die von der Grundannahme ausgehen, dass kognitive Repräsentationen und Prozesse nicht unabhängig von Wahrnehmung und Motorik betrachtet werden können. Kognition und Sprache sind in einem im Seminar zu konkretisierenden Sinn körperbasiert (embodied). Der Begriff embodiment schließt auch Interaktion von Organismus und Umwelt ein, die eine Grundlage für Intelligenz bildet. Mentale Repräsentationen sind aus Sicht des embodied cognition Ansatzes weder abstrakt noch arbiträr, sondern modal: Symbolische (z.B. linguistische) Repräsentationen und nicht-symbolische (z.B. perzeptuelle) Repräsentationen haben das gleiche Format. Dadurch steht dieses Modell im Gegensatz zu klassischen Auffassungen von Kognition, die kognitive Repräsentationen als abstrakt, amodal und arbiträr betrachten.
Eine erste Annäherung an das Thema embodied cognition erlauben zwei Beispiele aus der Psychologie. Untersuchungen haben gezeigt, dass die Körperhaltung von Probanden eine Auswirkung auf ihre kognitiven Prozesse (z.B. Urteile) haben kann. Ferner gibt es Hinweise, dass die mentalen Repräsentationen, die bei der Verarbeitung von Sprache eine Rolle spielen, identisch sind mit den Repräsentationen, die bei der sinnlichen Wahrnehmung entstehen. Was genau unter embodiment zu verstehen ist, und welche Konzeptionen dieses Begriffs eine herausragende Rolle in der aktuellen Forschung spielen, soll im Seminar untersucht werden.
Grundlage der Diskussion bilden zu etwa gleichen Teilen Texte aus der Kognitionswissenschaft, Psychologie, und der Linguistik. In den ersten Sitzungen des Seminars werden wir die Grundideen der embodied cognition Hypothese erarbeiten und uns der Frage zuwenden, was die Vertreter dieses Ansatzes von traditionellen Theorien des Geistes unterscheidet. Auch auf Vordenker des körperbasierten Ansatzes in der Philosophie der Antike bis hin zum 20. Jahrhundert soll kurz eingegangen werden . Im Zentrum des Seminars stehen drei Themenblöcke: Im ersten größeren Abschnitt sollen verschiedene Argumente für die Existenz analoger Repräsentationen erarbeitet werden. Unter analogen Repräsentationen werden Vorstellungen verstanden, die in gewisser Weise dem vorgestellten Gegenstand "analog" (also z. B. ähnlich) sind. Im zweiten Teil gehen wir auf den Zusammenhang zwischen Embodied Cognition und Sprache ein. Unter anderem sollen dabei Barsalous Theorie der Perceptual Symbol Systems – und damit die Begriffe der modalen Repräsentation und der Simulation – im Vordergrund stehen. Ferner werden wir Ansätze aus der kognitiven Linguistik diskutieren und kritisch hinterfragen, in deren Zentrum die Bedeutung von körperbasierten Metaphern für das Verständnis abstrakter Begriffe steht. Im dritten Teil des Seminars wenden wir uns verschiedenen Versuchen zu, die embodiment Hypothese auf die Modellierung grammatischer Phänomene anzuwenden. Dazu zählen beispielsweise die gebrauchsbasierte Theorie der Bedeutung sowie die Konstruktionsgrammatik, deren Plausibilität durch neuere Erkenntnisse aus der Spracherwerbsforschung (Tomasello) bestätigt wird. Im abschließenden Teil geht es um eine kritische Reflektion der in den vorangehenden Abschnitten diskutierten Theorien sowie um die Frage, ob und wie der Begriff des embodiment modifiziert und erweitert werden wollte.
Scheinkriterien sind die regelmäßige Teilnahme am Seminar, Übernahme eines Referats und die Anfertigung einer Seminararbeit.
Literatur
Embodied Cognition – Einführung, Grundlagen
Audi, R., (ed.) (1999). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chrisley, R., Ziemke, T. (2003). Embodiment. In: The Macmillan Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. (EC-Ordner)
Cowart, M. (2006). Embodied Cognition. In: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/ embodcog.htm].
Dreyfus, H.L. (1978). What computers can’t do. New York: Harpercollins. (relevante Kapitel: EC-Ordner)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pecher, D., Zwaan, R.A. (2005). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfeifer, R., Bongart, J.C. (2006). How the body shapes the way we think. A new view of intelligence. MIT Press.
Rohrer, T. (2007). The Body in Space: Embodiment, Experientialism and Linguistic Conceptualization. In: Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J. Frank, R., Dirven, R. (eds.). Body, Language and Mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 339-378. (EC-Ordner)
Shapiro, L. (2007). The Embodied Cognition Research Programme. Philosophy Compass 2-2, pp. 338-346. (EC-Ordner)
Valera, F., Thompson, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cognitive Science and human experience. MIT Press.
Wilson, Margaret. (2002). Six Views of Embodied Cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (4), pp. 625-636. (EC-Ordner)
Symbol Grounding
Cole, D. (2004). The Chinese Room Argument. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/].
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, pp. 335-346. (EC-Ordner)
Hauser, L. (2006). The Chinese Room Argument. In: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http://www.iep.utm.edu/c/chineser.htm].
Searle, J. (1984). Minds, Brains, and Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Searle, J.R. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 3 (3), pp. 417-457.
Konzeptualisierung
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp. 577-660. (EC-Ordner)
Barsalou, L.W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A.K., Wilson, C.D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (2), pp. 84-91. (EC-Ordner)
Glenberg, A.M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, pp. 1-55. (EC-Ordner)
Prototypentheorie und Kategorisierung
Berlin, B., Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms. Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press.
Garbarini, F., Adenzato, M. (2004). At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition 56, pp. 100–106. (EC-Ordner)
Kleiber, G. (1993). Prototypensemantik: eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.
Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (1999). Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Margolis, E. (2006). Concepts. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http:// plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts/#ProThe].
Murphy, G. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, Mass.; London: The MIT Press.
Rosch, E. (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum.
Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: OUP.
Sprache und Denken
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology 43: 1–22.
Boroditsky, L. (2003). Linguistic Relativity. In: Nadel, L. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. pp. 917-921.
Foley, W. (1997). Anthropological Linguistics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relational relativity and early word learning. In Bowerman, M., S. Levinson (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D. et al. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space - time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes. 27-5: 537-565.
Gleitman, L., Papafragou, A. (2005). Language and thought. In: K. Holyoak, Morrison, R. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 633-661.
Gumperz, J., Levinson, S.C., eds. (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Imai, M., Gentner, D. (1997). A crosslinguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition 62: 169-200.
Imai, M. (2000). Universal ontological knowledge and a bias toward language-specific categories in the construal of individuation. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity, 139-160. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jensen de López, K. (2002). Language-Specific Patterns in Danish and Zapotec Children's Comprehension of Spatial Grams. In E. Clark, The proceedings of the 31st Stanford Child Language Forum, Space in Language Location, Motion, Path, and Manner, April 12-13, Stanford University, pp. 50-59.
Johnson-Laird, P. (1980). Mental Models in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science 4, pp. 71-115.
Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. (1996a). Language and Space. Annual Review of Anthropology 25, pp. 353–382. (EC-Ordner)
Levinson, S. (1996b). Relativity and spatial conception and description. In: Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (eds.). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177-202. (EC-Ordner)
Levinson, S. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, P., Abarbanell, L., and Papafragou, A. (2005). Spatial reasoning skills in Tenejapan Mayans. Proceedings from the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lucy J. (1992a). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucy, J. (1992b). Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Papafragou, A. (2005). Relations between language and thought: Individuation and the count/mass distinction. In: Lefebre, C., Cohen, H. (eds.). Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. New York: Elsevier Science.
Papafragou, A. (2008). Space and the language-cognition interface. In: Carruthers, P., Laurence, S. and Stich, S. (eds.). The innate mind: Foundations and the future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (EC-Ordner)
Slobin, D.I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In: Gentner, D., Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 157-191.
Slobin, D.I. (2003). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In: S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Vol. 2. Typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 219-257.
Embodied Cognition und Sprache
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82.
Glenberg, A.M., Robertson, D.A. (2000). Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, pp. 379-401. (EC-Ordner)
Hurford, J. (2003) The neural basis of predicate-argument structure. Behavioral and brain sciences 26, pp. 261-316.
Kaschak, M. P., Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, pp. 508-529. (EC-Ordner)
MacWhinney, B. (1998). The emergence of language from embodiment. In: MacWhinney, B. (ed.). The Emergence of Language. Erlbaum, Mahwah.
MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of grammar from perspective taking. In: Pecher, D., Zwaan, R.A. (eds.). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198–223. (EC-Ordner)
Rohrer, T. (2006). Three Dogmas of Embodiment: Cognitive Linguistics as a Cognitive Science. In: Dirven, R., Kristiansen, G., Achard, M. (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Applications. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 119-146. (EC-Ordner)
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, pp. 162-185. (EC-Ordner)
Zwaan, R.A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B.H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44). New York: Academic Press, pp. 35-62. (EC-Ordner)
Zwaan, R.A., Madden, C.J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In: Pecher, D., Zwaan, R.A. (eds.). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 224-245.
Metaphern und Abstrakta
Amorim, M.-A., Isableu, B., Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied Spatial Transformations: “Body Analogy” for the Mental Rotation of Objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135 (3), pp. 327-347. (EC-Ordner)
Boroditsky, L., Ramscar, M., and Frank, M.C. (2001). The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. (EC-Ordner)
Casasanto, D. (2007). When is a Linguistic Metaphor a Conceptual Metaphor? In: Evans, V., Pourcel, S. (eds.). New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (EC-Ordner)
Casasanto, D., Lozano, S. (2006). Metaphor in the Mind and Hands. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 28. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 142-147. (EC-Ordner)
Casasanto, D., Borodotsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 106 (2); pp. 579-593. (EC-Ordner)
Gibbs, R.W. (2006). Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind & Language, 21 (3), pp. 434-458. (EC-Ordner)
Goschler, J. (2005). Embodiment and Body Metaphors. In: metaphorik.de [http:// www.metaphorik.de/ 09/goschler.htm].
Johnson, M. (1987.) The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2006). Embodiment, Experiential Focus, and Diachronic Change in Metaphor. In: McConchie, R. W., et al. (eds.). Selected Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis, pp. 1-7.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Papafragou, A. (1998). Experience and concept attainment: some critical remarks. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10.
Santiago, J. et al. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 (3), pp. 512-516. (EC-Ordner)
Construction Grammar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Croft, W., Cruse, D. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (relevante Kapitel im EC-Ordner) [Pt 1] [Pt 2] [Pt 3]
Evans, V., Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP. (relevante Kapitel im EC-Ordner) [Pt 1] [Pt 2] [Pt 3] [Pt 4] [Pt 5]
Fillmore, C., Kay, P. and O’Connor, M. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64, pp. 501-38.
Fillmore, C.J. (2003). Construction grammar. Stanford, Center for the Study of Language and Information Publication.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: OUP.
Goldberg, A.E. (2006). The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction. In: Geeraerts, D. (ed.). Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 401-437. (EC-Ordner) [Pt 1] [Pt 2]
Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D. and Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning Argument Structure Generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 15-3, pp. 289-316.
Goldberg, A.E., Bencini, G.M. (2005). Support from language processing for a constructional approach to grammar. In: Tyler, A., Takada, M., Kim, Y., Marinova, D. (eds.). Language in use: Cognitive and usage-based approaches to language and language learning. Georgetown, Georgetown University Press.
Kay, P., Fillmore, C. (1999). Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generali-zations: The What's X Doing Y? Construction. Language 75, pp. 1-33.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1): Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1993). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 2): Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R.W. (2002). Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. 2nd ed., Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP. (EC-Ordner) [Pt 1] [Pt 2] [Pt 3]
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps towards a usage based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 11, pp. 61-82.
Tomasello, M. (2006). Construction Grammar For Kids. Constructions. In: [http:// www.constructions-online.de/articles/specvol1/689].
Embodied Construction Grammar
Bergen, B., Chang, N. (2005). Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In: Östman, J.-O., Fried, M. (Eds.), Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam: Benjamin, pp. 147-190. (EC-Ordner)
Bergen, B., Chang, N., Narayan, S. (2004). Simulated Action in an Embodied Construction Grammar. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 25. (EC-Ordner)
Funktional-Neurophysiologische Studien
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S.M., Rizzolatti, G., Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent Embodied Representations for Visually Presented Actions and Linguistic Phrases Describing Actions. Current Biology, 16, pp. 1-6. (EC-Ordner)
Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24 (3), pp. 355-363.
Kosslyn, S.M. (1994). Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp. 253-336. (EC-Ordner)
Pulvermüller, F., Härle, M., Hummel, F. (2001). Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language, 78, pp. 143-168. (EC-Ordner)
Pulvermüller, F. (2002). The neuroscience of language: on brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rohrer, T. (2005). “Image Schemata in the Brain.” In Hampe, B. and Grady, J. (eds.). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 165-196. (EC-Ordner)
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M.C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S.F., Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, pp. 273-281. (EC-Ordner)
Psychologisch-Behaviorale Studien
Bergen, B. & K. Wheeler. (2005). Sentence understanding engages motor processes. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 27. (EC-Ordner)
Bergen, B. (2005). Mental Simulation in Spatial Language Processing. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 27. (EC-Ordner)
Bergen, B. (2007). Experimental methods for simulation semantics. In: Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S., Spivey, M.J. (eds.). Methods in Cognitive Linguistics: Ithaca. John Benjamins. (EC-Ordner)
Bergen, B., S. Narayan, J. Feldman (2003). Embodied verbal semantics: evidence from an image-verb matching task. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 25. (EC-Ordner)
Borreggine, K., Kaschak, M. (2006). The Action Sentence Compatibility Effect: It's All in the Timing. Cognitive Science, 30, pp. 1-16. (EC-Ordner)
Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M.K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 12, pp. 455-459. (EC-Ordner)
Glenberg, A.M., Kaschak, M.P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, pp. 558-565. (EC-Ordner)
Kaup, B., Lüdtke, J., Zwaan, R.A. (2006). Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp. 1033-1050. (EC-Ordner)
Richardson, D.C., Spivey, M.J., Barsalou, L.W., McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, pp. 767-780. (EC-Ordner)
Stanfield, R.A., Zwaan, R.A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, pp. 153-156. (EC-Ordner)
Zwaan, R.A., Stanfield, R.A., Yaxley, R.H. (2002). Language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, pp. 168-171. (EC-Ordner)
Zwaan, R.A., Taylor, L.J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 135, pp. 1-11. (EC-Ordner)
Computationale Modellierung
Dominey, Peter Ford (2003). Learning Grammatical Constructions in a Miniature Language from Narrated Video Events. In: Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 25. (EC-Ordner)
Feldman, J., Narayanan, S. (2004). Embodied Meaning in a Neural Theory of Language. Brain and Language, Vol. 89, pp. 385-392. (EC-Ordner)
Frank, S.L., Koppen, M., Noordman, L.G.M., Vonk, W. (2003). Modelling knowledge-based inferences in story comprehenion. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27 (6), pp. 875-910.
Mayberry, M.R. & Miikkulainen, Risto (2003). Incremental Nonmonotonic Parsing through Semantic Selforganization. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 25.
Wennekers, T., Garagnani, M., Pulvermüller, F. (2006). Language models based on Hebbian cell assemblies. JP Paris 100, pp. 16-30. (EC-Ordner)
Materialien
...
Zeitplan
23.04.08
1) Besprechung und Organisation des Seminars, Einführung ins Thema mit Überblick über die relevanten Themen, Besprechung der Literatur
Vorlesung I: Philosophische Grundlagen der Embodied Cognition
Literatur: Dreyfus (1989)
30.04.08
2) Vorlesung II: Einführung Embodied Cognition
Literatur: Wilson (2002), Shapiro (2007)
Optional: Barsalou (1999), Glenberg (1997), Zwaan (2004)
07.05.08
3) Vorlesung III: Einführung Construction Grammar
Literatur: Evans & Green (2006), Croft & Cruse (2004)
Optional: Fillmore (2003)
21.05.08
4) Kategorisierung und Konzeptualisierung
Literatur: Barsalou (1999)
Optional: Barsalou et al. (2003), Glenberg (1997)
28.05.08
5) Psychologisch-behaviorale Ansätze zu Embodiment und Sprache I
Literatur: Glenberg & Kaschack (2002)
Optional: Bergen (2005), Casasanto (2006), Zwaan (2006)
04.06.08
6) Psychologisch-behaviorale Ansätze zu Embodiment und Sprache II
Literatur: Zwaan (2004)
Optional: Zwaan et al. (2002), Pulvermüller et al. (2001)
11.06.08
7) Language and Thought I: Anthropologische Untersuchungen
Literatur: Foley (1997: Kap. 8, 12), Gleitman/Papafragou (2005)
Optional: Boroditsky (2001, 2003), Lucy (1992a,b), Papafragou (2005),
Slobin (2003, 2004)
18.06.08
8) Language and Thought II: Sprache und Raum
Literatur: Foley (1997: Kap. 11), Levinson (1996a)
Optional: Levinson (1996b, 2003), Papafragou (2008)
25.06.08
9) Construction Grammar I: Spracherwerb
Literatur: Tomasello (2003)
Optional: Tomasello (2000), Tomasello (2006)
02.07.08
10) Construction Grammar II: Formal-analytischer Ansatz
Literatur: Goldberg (2006), Evans & Green (2006), Croft & Cruse (2004)
Optional: Fillmore (2003)
09.07.08
11) Construction Grammar III: Embodied Construction Grammar
Literatur: Bergen & Chang (2005)
Optional: Bergen et al. (2004), Feldman & Narayanan (2004)
16.07.08
12) Komputationale Ansätze: Embodied Cognition und Modellierung
Literatur: Chang et al. (2004), Wenneckers et al. (2006)
Optional: Dominey (2003), Frank et al (2003), Feldman & Narayanan (2004)
23.07.08
13) Abschluss-Diskussion: Abgrenzung der Embodied Cognition zu klassischen Theorien der Kognition;
Ausblick zu Erweiterungsmöglichkeiten der Embodied Cognition
Links
Barsalou, L.W. [http://www.psychology.emory.edu/cognition/barsalou/index.html]
Bergen, B. [http://www2.hawaii.edu/~bergen/]
Borodotsky, L. [http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~lera/]
Buccino, G. [http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/english/staff/buccino.htm]
Bybee, J. [http://www.unm.edu/~jbybee/]
Casasanto, D. [http://www.stanford.edu/~casasan/]
Croft, W. [http://www.unm.edu/~wcroft/]
Evans, V. [http://www.vyvevans.net/]
Goldberg, A. [http://www.princeton.edu/~adele/].
Levinson, S. [http://www.mpi.nl/Members/StephenLevinson/Publications].
MacWhinney, B. [http://www.cnbc.cmu.edu/faculty/macwhinney.shtml …Sammlung ausgewählter Papers auf: http://psyling.psy.cmu.edu/papers/]
Papafragou, A. [http://papafragou.psych.udel.edu/]
Pulvermüller, F. [http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/friedemann.pulvermuller/]
Rohrer, T. [http://zakros.ucsd.edu/~trohrer/]
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http://plato.stanford.edu].
The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/embodcog.htm].
Tomasello, M. [http://email.eva.mpg.de/~tomas/].
Zwaan, R. [http://www.brain-cognition.eu/index.html?personal.php?id=Zwaan].